I am starting to get lots of questions about the essay, so this tells me that students are really starting to work on it. Good! Periodically, I will post some Questions & Answers based on real student questions. I will post things that seem generally relevant to the assignment and could benefit everyone, but will not post questions that reveal anyone’s original argument about the essay. So check back here every day or so…

First Q & A:

Q: I’m a bit confused as to what would constitute a sequence in this short film. The directions say to closely analyze at least 2 sequences to support our argument; would a sequence constitute a shot? or a beat? or a section of the play (eg. before the Assistant is on stage)?

A: You are quite right, mystery student, to wonder about the definition of sequence, especially in a film that is so short. By definition, a sequence is a series of shots that communicate a moment or event. I also think that this definition in one online dictionary is accurate: “a succession of related shots that develop a given subject” (http://ardictionary.com/Sequence/4928) In your question above, I think that a section of the play, or even part of a section of the play, is the best approximation. My main intention in stating that you must analyse at least 2 sequences was to encourage students to really closely analyse the film, right down to noting the relationship created from one shot to the next. So don’t worry too much about the definition of sequence, but do force yourself to get as specific as possible when referring to the film.